Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	HP Z220 CMT Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1790
Memory	3.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120503
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '20 at 17:08
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Memory 85.2 1-Core 95 2-Core 189 71% 123 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 351 48% 357 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz) 146,665 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1790) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Lighting 1.77 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.63 fps	MRender 3.52 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.48 2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB 47,588 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 261GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2AR10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 51 43 51 53 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 46 Write 38.5 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 48.1 30% 41 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 59%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 8.7 8.7 8.7 8 8.6 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 23 Write 0.8 Mixed 6 SusWrite 8.2 10% 9.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2.3 149% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB 4,247 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 23.5 Write 18 Mixed 16.5 24% 19.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.3 147% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 27%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB 3,961 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 99 101 102 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 82.5 Write 39 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 101 79% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 7% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 M378B5773DH0-CK0 M378B5273CH0-CK0 12GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 22.1 MC Mixed 17.5 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 10.8 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	101x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	71x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	71x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,354 samples	33x
16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GBMicronBench 55%, 1,512 samples	25x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	25x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16