Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive75.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R3.0  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181005
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '20 at 17:08
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 72.2
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 181
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 348
47% 347 Pts
64-Core 347
23% 347 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66%
Great: 76%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intenso SATA III SSD 120GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 138 63 98 69 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 454
Write 256
Mixed 317
SusWrite 100
62% 282 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 30.6
130% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 181
159% 235 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 90%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$39
191GB free
Firmware: 1002YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 106 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 80.2
Write 78.3
Mixed 46
SusWrite 106
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 8GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.8
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 28.3
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 23.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $336
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $260Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback