Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 925 518 User benchmarks, average bench 31% uPGA-478, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	35.7% Below average	Memory 67.4 1-Core 31.1 2-Core 25.4 32% 41.3 Pts	4-Core 27.5 8-Core 27.7 4% 27.6 Pts	64-Core 21.1 1% 21.1 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 048A) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.46% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 0.46 Parallax 0.53 0% 0.52 fps	MRender 0.38 Gravity 0.57 Splatting 0.7 0% 0.55 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.46% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 229GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 62.5 Write 53.3 Mixed 37.2 38% 51 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.1 37% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	5.46% Terrible	MC Read 1.1 MC Write 0.6 MC Mixed 1.4 3% 1.03 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 1.3 SC Mixed 0.7 2% 0.73 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 5.46% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 925IntelBench 31%, 518 samples	8x
Celeron 900IntelBench 30%, 3,169 samples	4x
Core2 Duo T9550Intel $199Bench 39%, 1,427 samples	2x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	15x
Intel 45 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 716 samples	1x

SSD
LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 11,477 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
MX100 128GBCrucial $74Bench 76%, 9,892 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16