To Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	To Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190530
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '20 at 16:55
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 0-$230 10,189 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 94.9 1-Core 107 2-Core 213 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 588 59% 477 Pts	64-Core 748 46% 748 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 3724) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Lighting 69.6 Reflection 69 Parallax 60 57% 66.2 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 66.8 Splatting 66.7 55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 174 150 151 152 151 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.6% Good	Read 247 Write 228 Mixed 223 SusWrite 170 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 44 4K Mixed 32 104% 34.1 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 115%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 89GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 119 90 103 106 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 114 Write 107 Mixed 107 SusWrite 104 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.6 134% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0- 4x8GB 634 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 44 MC Write 44.2 MC Mixed 40.2 122% 42.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 14.2 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 57.3 70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,969 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	505x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	215x
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples	95x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	140x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	112x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	90x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	103x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	47x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	42x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	198x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	190x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	82x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16