Asus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '20 at 16:02
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 163
2-Core 267
99% 175 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,006
95% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,188
74% 1,188 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
EVGA(3842 3288) ≥ 4GB; EVGA GTX 2080 Super FTW3
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Lighting 191
Reflection 178
Parallax 179
155% 182 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 164
Splatting 116
125% 159 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 136%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$189
492GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101140RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1480 812 1060 1059 1057 1032 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,926
Write 1,876
Mixed 1,616
SusWrite 1,083
365% 1,625 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 47.7
156% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1083
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 231
263% 479 MB/s
Poor: 191%
This bench: 219%
Great: 337%
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$189
484GB free
Firmware: 101140RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1654 1359 1348 1342 1324 1339 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
239% Outstanding
Read 1,907
Write 1,795
Mixed 1,648
SusWrite 1,394
379% 1,686 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 46.9
157% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,188
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 217
267% 504 MB/s
Poor: 191%
This bench: 239%
Great: 337%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
670GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 383 401 405 409 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 444
Mixed 399
SusWrite 397
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 42.1
143% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 99.8
DQ Mixed 183
150% 223 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
682GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 401 401 398 393 397 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 406
Mixed 394
SusWrite 397
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 43.9
144% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 86.5
DQ Mixed 164
139% 211 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 98%
Great: 133%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 32GB
30GB free, PID 5572
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.7 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
9.58% Terrible
Read 19
Write 11.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 3.1
12% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.4
154% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.58%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 31.7
105% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 43
SC Mixed 31.6
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 55.9
72% 55.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA Builds (Compare 973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X FORMULA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $942
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback