Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7020U 28,454 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 64.3 2-Core 113 54% 86 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 192 25% 190 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99 7,913 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4162000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 299 295 289 290 293 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 456 Write 422 Mixed 219 SusWrite 297 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 32.8 4K Mixed 22.6 80% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 223 176% 250 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 104%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 29GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 9.1 22 19 22 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 181 Write 12.7 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 22.7 47% 55.7 MB/s	4K Read 11.4 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 3.5 236% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x4GB 11,378 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	61.2% Good	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 20.2 62% 21.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 24.3 SC Mixed 18.1 52% 18 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 53%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	213x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	122x
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples	33x

SSD
MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 78%, 14,590 samples	62x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	30x
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	27x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	54x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	42x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 32%, 18,494 samples	34x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16