MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7994
MotherboardMSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)  (all builds)
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '20 at 10:03
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$276
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Memory 30.7
1-Core 25.5
2-Core 47.5
22% 34.6 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 213
21% 166 Pts
64-Core 339
23% 339 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 8496) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.17
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 0.56
1% 1.18 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 2.13
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.92 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 138 78 30 127 29 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.1% Very poor
Read 164
Write 83.1
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 90.9
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 5.7
20% 6.43 MB/s
DQ Read 18.9
DQ Write 19.7
DQ Mixed 14.4
12% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 103%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$50
89GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 245 297 266 292 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 297
Write 258
Mixed 252
SusWrite 264
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 14.5
45% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 51.5
DQ Mixed 61.6
61% 101 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 129%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 85.4
Write 114
Mixed 74.5
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
141% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 93%
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
851GB free
Firmware: 01.00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 25 29 26 32 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 93
Write 29
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 26.4
32% 43.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
75% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 83%
General USB Flash Disk 16GB
12GB free, PID 8005
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.7 4.3 5.2 5.1 4.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 17.4
Write 1
SusWrite 4.7
7% 7.7 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 5%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 15.5
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.4 GB/s
Latency 251
16% 251 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H110M GAMING (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 2,147 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $600
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $193Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $250Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $181
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $71SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $639SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback