Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B450M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190307
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '20 at 09:30
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 56.5 1-Core 40 2-Core 104 40% 66.8 Pts	4-Core 277 8-Core 611 52% 444 Pts	64-Core 800 50% 800 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PwrHis(1787 D580) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.3 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.3% Average	Lighting 46.2 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 89.7 38% 65.2 fps	MRender 68.3 Gravity 66.5 Splatting 56.3 51% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hkvsn HS-SSD-C100/120G 120GB 944 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 93 94 53 53 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 387 Write 55.5 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 71.4 32% 150 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 9.1 55% 19.1 MB/s	DQ Read 90 DQ Write 51.4 DQ Mixed 12.9 25% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 79%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 374GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 165 168 165 166 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	95.8% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 164 Mixed 110 SusWrite 166 112% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown VMA42UG-MEC1U2AJ2 2x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	MC Read 40 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 32.1 99% 34.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 16.6 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 8,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $79

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,916x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,683x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	605x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	720x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	499x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	473x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	230x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	213x
MX500 500GBCrucial $55Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	149x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	592x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	491x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	356x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $402

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16