Asus H110M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 62% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170704
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '20 at 09:22
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Memory 93.2 1-Core 126 2-Core 251 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 476 64% 480 Pts	64-Core 492 30% 492 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Zotac(19DA 1527) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	86.6% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 106 Parallax 107 89% 107 fps	MRender 134 Gravity 102 Splatting 77 82% 104 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74 9,892 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 180 181 180 147 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 455 Write 185 Mixed 228 SusWrite 162 57% 257 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 97 4K Mixed 40.3 148% 55.8 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 168 146% 221 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 89%
Toshiba MQ02ABD100H-SSHD-8GB 1TB 171 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 86GB free Firmware: HEFC1E SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 82.5 Write 82.7 Mixed 31 SusWrite 68.9 15% 66.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 1.9 13% 6.7 MB/s	DQ Read 2.2 DQ Write 21.5 DQ Mixed 7.6 7% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67 46,617 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	72.5% Very good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 27.7 MC Mixed 21.7 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 24.4 SC Mixed 21.8 60% 21.1 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	176x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	146x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	116x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	98x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	90x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	41x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	30x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x

RAM
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	18x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	18x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $166

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16