Asus F1A75-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '20 at 02:52
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 46.3 2-Core 93.2 46% 71.1 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 182 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 185 11% 185 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% ASRock(1849 5001) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.3 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.6% Average	Lighting 44.1 Reflection 52.9 Parallax 80.8 36% 59.3 fps	MRender 69.7 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 56.6 53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1210A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 128 29 4.3 35 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 495 Write 365 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 48.3 50% 229 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.4 28% 7.33 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 101%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79 133,734 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 813GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 157 158 156 154 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Read 101 Write 126 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 156 74% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 2 365% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	43.6% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 14.2 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.3 GB/s	Latency 93 43% 93 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M PRO Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M PRO - $80

CPU
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	19x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	10x
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	4x
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	3x
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	3x

SSD
THNSNF128GCSS 128GBToshibaBench 68%, 2,061 samples	2x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	3x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	2x
99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 7,477 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $161

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16