Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '20 at 16:10
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	SYC-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 89 1-Core 114 2-Core 226 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 436 8-Core 701 70% 569 Pts	64-Core 892 55% 892 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Gigabyte(1458 22FC) CLim: 1480 MHz, MLim: 2175 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Lighting 79.2 Reflection 73.2 Parallax 97.7 64% 83.4 fps	MRender 73.7 Gravity 80.1 Splatting 60.6 58% 71.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,163 Write 3,174 Mixed 3,195 849% 3,844 MB/s	4K Read 398 4K Write 222 4K Mixed 269 1,065% 296 MB/s	DQ Read 1,151 DQ Write 739 DQ Mixed 849 659% 913 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: SC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 165 167 168 169 167 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 100 Write 166 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 167 88% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 0.7 232% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 113%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 4 4.8 4.8 4.8 5 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	5.82% Terrible	Read 26.8 Write 19.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 5.1 16% 14 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.82% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AR32C16S8K2SU416R AR32C16S8KSU416R 16GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 3333, 3333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 45.8 MC Write 40 MC Mixed 35.7 116% 40.5 GB/s	SC Read 26.3 SC Write 37.3 SC Mixed 29.7 89% 31.1 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,385x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	806x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	470x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	423x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	294x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	293x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	151x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	128x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	387x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	240x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	206x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $475

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16