| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Gigabyte X299 DESIGNARE EX |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF (all builds) |
| Memory | 57.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190924 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 12 '20 at 23:46 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
82%
Excellent
|
80% 149 Pts
|
82% 671 Pts
|
84% 1360 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.6%
Very poor
|
16% 20.5 fps
|
20% 24.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$234
458GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1141 1008 963 997 1003 1002 MB/s
|
200%
Outstanding
|
325% 1,453 MB/s
|
149% 50.1 MB/s
|
213% 289 MB/s
|
|
WD Gold 12TB (2017)-$280
9TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 160 170 166 166 160 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
114% 156 MB/s
|
204% 1.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
90%
Excellent
|
103% 35.9 GB/s
|
37% 13 GB/s
|
40% 101 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 273 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-10980XEIntel $1,100Bench 84%, 4,959 samples | 45x |
| Core i9-9900XIntel $620Bench 84%, 3,521 samples | 28x |
| Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 26x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 31x |
| RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 24x |
| RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 23x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Above average | Total price: $1,628 |