Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 130%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 16:56
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-9960X-$1,337
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 260
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 995
92% 748 Pts
64-Core 2623
176% 2623 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$408
EVGA(3842 5170) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Lighting 281
Reflection 280
Parallax 278
74% 280 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 257
Splatting 207
71% 217 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$180
710GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1866 1875 1272 1005 1011 1013 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
299% Outstanding
Read 1,914
Write 1,827
Mixed 1302
SusWrite 1,340
358% 1,596 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 182
4K Mixed 75.9
270% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1387
DQ Write 1,197
DQ Mixed 1,294
969% 1,292 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 299%
Great: 353%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 411030RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 447 444 442 443 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 422
Mixed 366
SusWrite 446
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 41.1
146% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 246
211% 312 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 105%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$300
1TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 447 445 442 443 442 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 412
Mixed 387
SusWrite 447
95% 420 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 41.2
147% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 355
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 106%
Great: 133%
Intel HBRPEKNX0202AH 512GB
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 922 925 924 914 922 920 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 135 137 135 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 148
Write 125
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 135
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 84%
USB DISK 3.0 248GB
196GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 36 36 35 34 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 114
Write 66.7
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 33.7
81% 67 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
59% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.2% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 21.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 11.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 3,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,283
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback