Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 128%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 16:49
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-9960X-$1,337
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 258
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 984
92% 742 Pts
64-Core 2,617
176% 2,617 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$408
EVGA(3842 5170) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Lighting 284
Reflection 275
Parallax 278
75% 279 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 257
Splatting 198
71% 214 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$180
710GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1860 1871 1271 1007 1016 1018 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 1,931
Write 1842
Mixed 1,302
SusWrite 1,340
360% 1,604 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 68
265% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,370
DQ Write 1,178
DQ Mixed 1,272
954% 1,273 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 296%
Great: 353%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 411030RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 445 444 442 441 442 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 421
Write 402
Mixed 359
SusWrite 446
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 33.7
122% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 244
210% 311 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$300
1TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 445 444 442 442 442 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 427
Write 408
Mixed 387
SusWrite 446
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 41.5
142% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 353
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 104%
Great: 133%
Intel HBRPEKNX0202AH 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 931 923 925 922 880 875 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 133 135 137 135 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 143
Write 126
Mixed 85
SusWrite 135
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 84%
USB DISK 3.0 248GB
196GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 35 34 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 114
Write 66.7
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 32.7
80% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
59% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.9% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 21.6
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 10.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 3,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,283
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback