Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	27.4% Poor	Memory 33.1 1-Core 42.5 2-Core 80.5 30% 52 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 159 18% 139 Pts	64-Core 158 10% 158 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6471 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.45% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 2.81 2% 2.53 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.87 Splatting 0.04 1% 1.34 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.45% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB 30,897 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: UI450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 3.7 28 2.5 7.4 108 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.8% Very poor	Read 157 Write 193 Mixed 30 SusWrite 53.4 24% 108 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 16.2 4K Mixed 6.1 22% 8.57 MB/s	DQ Read 94.5 DQ Write 68 DQ Mixed 39.8 41% 67.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 19.8% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x3GB 487 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2 of 2 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	22.5% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.7 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 237 17% 237 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	26x
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	10x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	35x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	20x
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16