Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '20 at 10:21
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$295
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 147
2-Core 269
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 1,141
101% 858 Pts
64-Core 1,160
72% 1,160 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Gigabyte(1458 377A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.5% Good
Lighting 79.6
Reflection 92.3
Parallax 60.6
65% 77.5 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 62.3
55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2320000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 141 145 168 171 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46% Average
Read 412
Write 152
Mixed 168
SusWrite 158
49% 222 MB/s
4K Read 15.6
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 9.3
56% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 78.4
DQ Write 75
DQ Mixed 55.9
48% 69.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 71%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
168GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 260 253 380 407 415 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 457
Write 424
Mixed 426
SusWrite 331
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 33
107% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 72.8
DQ Write 75.9
DQ Mixed 76.2
57% 75 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
278GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 77 84 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 120
Write 98.7
Mixed 79
SusWrite 83
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 23.5
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 24.6
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $869
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback