HP Z8 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics91.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory768GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 768GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemHP Z8 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C7
Memory744 GB free of 768 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime4.9 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '20 at 06:04
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4214Y
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.8% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 163
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 652
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 2,416
162% 2,416 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Nvidia(10DE 12A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Lighting 352
Reflection 328
Parallax 366
92% 349 fps
MRender 334
Gravity 304
Splatting 237
92% 292 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 98%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HALR-000H2 1TB
782GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA71HAQ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1278 1119 1059 1084 1088 1040 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,878
Write 1,934
Mixed 1,438
SusWrite 1,111
357% 1,590 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 49.2
167% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 760
DQ Write 621
DQ Mixed 719
531% 700 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 225%
Great: 319%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 127 127 126 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 131
Write 118
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 127
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1
288% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 136%
WD WD101KFBX-68R56N0 10TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 128 127 126 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 128
Write 120
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 127
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.1
310% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 136%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$269
7TB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 128 126 127 126 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 128
Write 120
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 126
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.3
219% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 97%
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 124 125 124 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 108
Write 103
Mixed 66.5
SusWrite 124
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 9965694-005.B00G 9965694-012.B00G 9965694-005.B00G 9965694-012.B00G 9965694-005.B00G 9965694-012.B00G 9965694-012.B00G 9965694-012.B00G 9965694-012.B00G King... 767GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
121% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 61.1
MC Mixed 48.2
145% 50.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.3
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z8 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

System: HP Z8 G4 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback