Lenovo 10MUS1HV00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 10MUS1HV00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 310B
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190121
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '20 at 16:13
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 89
2-Core 175
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 322
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 310B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.63% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 6.75
5% 7.83 fps
MRender 7.86
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 0.04
3% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.63%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L7QCXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 311 309 307 304 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1705
Write 1,288
Mixed 709
SusWrite 333
223% 1,009 MB/s
4K Read 54
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 64.7
221% 75.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,093
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 881
678% 928 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 199%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback