PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3048h |
Memory | 3.5 GB free of 6.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20090825 |
Uptime | 16.7 Days |
Run Date | Feb 10 '20 at 15:04 |
Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$44
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
|
46.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0
|
31.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 91 76 94 96 89 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
17.8%
Very poor
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 97x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 81x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 34x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples | 205x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 36x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 27x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 12x |
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples | 6x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $116 |