Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 Convertible Micro (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 10 '20 at 10:49
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 79 1-Core 102 2-Core 204 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 500 52% 420 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15 52,547 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 3396) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89 11,245 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 17GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 240 Write 149 Mixed 155 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 55.5 4K Mixed 27.6 102% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 28.3 74% 161 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 89%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 42GB free Firmware: EXM0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 466 Write 277 Mixed 304 77% 349 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 68.7 4K Mixed 39.8 133% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 388 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 46 115% 244 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 4x8GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.9% Average	MC Read 18.9 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 14.6 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 15.7 SC Mixed 15.5 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 82.5 48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16