PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 9.03% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T7610 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T7610 (all builds) |
Memory | 242.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180709 |
Uptime | 18.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 09 '20 at 17:37 |
Run Duration | 161 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
72.9%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
PNY(196E 12FB) ≥ 4GB; PNY GeForce RTX2080 Ti 11GB X
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
123%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 25 26 86 2.6 16 MB/s
|
9.03%
Terrible
|
|||
Samsung 860 500GB
43GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 310 309 308 301 281 MB/s
|
95.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba MG03ACA2 2TB
245GB free
Firmware: FL1D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 83 78 83 76 MB/s
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
449GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 36JSF2G72PZ-1G9E1 16x16GB
16 of 16 slots used
256GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
110%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 64x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v21stBench 75%, 766 samples | 64x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v21stBench 66%, 1,377 samples | 40x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 56x |
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 41x |
Quadro K6000Nvidia $4,000Bench 44%, 1,173 samples | 24x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |