Asus M80CJ

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus M80CJ (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M80CJ
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161130
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '20 at 17:32
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	99%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 111 2-Core 210 78% 136 Pts	4-Core 398 8-Core 398 53% 398 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 873B) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Lighting 68 Reflection 66.8 Parallax 58.3 55% 64.4 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 65.2 Splatting 68.7 56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GB 39,780 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 205GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 251 248 247 250 246 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 421 Write 252 Mixed 209 SusWrite 248 63% 282 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 26.4 124% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 185 173% 272 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 83%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: AX0R5J SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 110 110 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 105 Write 106 Mixed 35.3 SusWrite 109 64% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	44.1% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 11.8 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13.9 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M80CJ Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Asus M80CJ

CPU
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	32x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	32x

SSD
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	12x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	6x
S700 120GBHP $30Bench 62%, 4,522 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	23x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	2x
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 18,452 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16