Asus G10AC

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	66.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus G10AC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G10AC
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131206
Uptime	8.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '20 at 23:27
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 108 2-Core 215 80% 139 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 556 56% 457 Pts	64-Core 555 34% 555 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 850A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1556 MHz, MLim: 1802 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Lighting 84.3 Reflection 86 Parallax 76.6 69% 82.3 fps	MRender 81.3 Gravity 76.8 Splatting 68.8 61% 75.6 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,651 Write 4,633 Mixed 4874 1,125% 5,053 MB/s	4K Read 444 4K Write 209 4K Mixed 220 1,066% 291 MB/s	DQ Read 960 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 680 490% 650 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 83GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 309 308 309 308 430 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 416 Write 270 Mixed 458 SusWrite 350 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 99.6 4K Mixed 56.5 188% 65.9 MB/s	DQ Read 333 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 314 237% 317 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 138GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 172 166 160 154 148 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 465 Mixed 458 SusWrite 202 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 42.1 4K Write 92.8 4K Mixed 55.8 184% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 360 269% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 129%
General UDisk 4GB 968 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 3.2 3.1 3 3.3 3.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	2.64% Terrible	Read 9 Write 1 Mixed 1.2 SusWrite 3 4% 3.55 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.64% Great: 8%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12 26,708 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 39GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 8.8 13 14 14 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 82.5 Write 34.2 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 14.9 34% 33.6 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.4 97% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 30%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 817 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 3600 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.7 3.1 3.1 3.3 3.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	2.97% Terrible	Read 9 Write 3 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3 6% 4.88 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.97% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16.9 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 20.1 SC Mixed 19.2 52% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G10AC Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G10AC

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	211x
Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	92x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	25x

SSD
RBU-SC400S37128G 128GBKingstonBench 70%, 864 samples	16x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	11x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	36x
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	22x
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 4x8GBKingstonBench 56%, 370 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $75

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16