Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive307% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime5 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '20 at 17:02
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 151
2-Core 304
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1046
99% 821 Pts
64-Core 1435
89% 1435 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 12FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3575 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.7
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.4
Gravity 19.9
Splatting 26
20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1085 794 776 773 773 770 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2586
Write 2,533
Mixed 1,834
SusWrite 828
435% 1,945 MB/s
4K Read 66
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 93.3
315% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,330
DQ Write 1165
DQ Mixed 1,239
931% 1,245 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 307%
Great: 355%
Toshiba THNSFJ256GCSU 256GB
113GB free
Firmware: JULA1102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 149 217 217 216 211 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 494
Write 429
Mixed 438
SusWrite 222
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 40.5
132% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 194
146% 195 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 100%
Kingdian S280 480GB
31GB free
Firmware: R0817A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 49 15 26 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 482
Write 67.2
Mixed 108
SusWrite 28.9
37% 172 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 11.5
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 3.9
DQ Mixed 47.5
44% 74.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 128%
Seagate ST31000322CS 1TB-$250
710GB free
Firmware: CA13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 55 58 53 55 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 55.3
Write 52
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 55.2
37% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 62%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
12GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
8.77% Terrible
Read 31
Write 12.8
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 12.9
17% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.77%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 32.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 31.9
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 108%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $740
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback