Asus P5L-MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.002% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAsus P5L-MX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P5L-MX
Memory0.2 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '20 at 15:44
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Pentium Dual E2160-$47
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
1-Core 27.4
2-Core 54.4
19% 40.9 Pts
4-Core 55.5
8-Core 55.6
8% 55.5 Pts
64-Core 54.7
4% 54.7 Pts
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 14%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 7300 SE
Device(0000 0000) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.002% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.1
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.002%
Great: 0%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$30
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 26 23 8.1 6.3 8.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 48.9
Write 62.6
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 14.5
31% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x1GB
1 of 2 slots used
1GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.2
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 0
5% 1.77 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 39%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P5L-MX Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus P5L-MX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback