Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Bekopc-arcelik BC1:66I-01785-BC2:00146182254096-NOD32 KEY:NT70-M4TVD2HM (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte P35-S3G
Memory	2.8 GB free of 5 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 960 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '20 at 15:19
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Memory 67.3 1-Core 18.4 2-Core 37 31% 40.9 Pts	4-Core 72.1 8-Core 72.2 10% 72.1 Pts	64-Core 72 4% 72 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 405 MHz, MLim: 202 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.91% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 2.81 Parallax 2.03 2% 2.38 fps	MRender 3.29 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 1.78 2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.91% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50 17,310 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 818GB free (System drive) Firmware: CV26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 142 180 179 195 187 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 198 Mixed 81.3 SusWrite 174 119% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 5GB 14,654 User benchmarks, average bench 18% null MHz 2048, 2048, 1024 MB Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.87 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4 11% 4 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16