Biostar TZ68K+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardBiostar TZ68K+  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120709
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '20 at 14:05
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$50
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 80.8
2-Core 135
61% 98 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 192
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 205
14% 205 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Zotac(19DA 1291) 1GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
9.09% Terrible
Lighting 10.2
Reflection 9.58
Parallax 12.1
8% 10.6 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 13.4
10% 13.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.09%
Great: 10%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
MGTEC 240GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1115A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 219 57 8.5 60 5.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 341
Write 303
Mixed 263
SusWrite 79.9
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 9.1
66% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 20.5
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 16.1
26% 46.5 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
22GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 42 59 45 35 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47% Average
Read 117
Write 92.5
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 46.8
61% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 47%
Great: 114%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 2GB
2GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.8 7.1 6.9 6.9 7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
4.12% Terrible
Read 13.5
Write 5.3
Mixed 6
SusWrite 6.9
10% 7.92 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.12%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 12.2
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TZ68K+ Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TZ68K+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $346
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback