| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock 990FX Killer (all builds) |
| Memory | 7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20131206 |
| Uptime | 7.1 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 08 '20 at 04:27 |
| Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.3%
Good
|
56% 88.2 Pts
|
40% 328 Pts
|
24% 394 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Gigabyte(1458 367D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
59.6%
Above average
|
60% 66.3 fps
|
59% 72.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate 600 240GB-$215
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C675
|
91% 410 MB/s
|
110% 39.6 MB/s
|
182% 245 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
291GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 95 95 92 90 MB/s
|
49.7%
Average
|
62% 84.2 MB/s
|
198% 1.43 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
577GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 88 88 88 87 MB/s
|
50.3%
Above average
|
57% 77.1 MB/s
|
193% 1.43 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
48GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 72 73 73 74 71 MB/s
|
42.2%
Average
|
49% 66.6 MB/s
|
157% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
44.7%
Average
|
46% 15.9 GB/s
|
29% 10 GB/s
|
54% 74 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 257 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 138x |
| FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 29x |
| FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 22x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 18x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $494 |