Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120312
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 23:39
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
60% Good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 47
2-Core 92
51% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 223
25% 194 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.18% Terrible
Lighting 9.13
Reflection 9.08
Parallax 7.19
7% 8.47 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 6.53
Splatting 8.91
7% 8.07 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.18%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
59GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 54 53 53 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 50.7
Write 47.3
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 53.4
39% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30%
Great: 69%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
331GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 75 73 72 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 55.7
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 72.6
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 69%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 66 94 88 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 74.5
Write 68.2
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 82.4
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 77%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
279GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 70.8
Write 53.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 76.9
81% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 42%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
107GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 62
Write 65.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 59.1
78% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.8% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback