Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120312
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 23:39
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175
AM3r2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
38.6% Below average
1-Core 60.6
2-Core 117
42% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 295
32% 250 Pts
64-Core 304
20% 304 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
5.73% Terrible
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 23.6
Parallax 23
7% 24.7 fps
MRender 18.4
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 20.5
6% 19.5 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 6%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$66
59GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 54 54 53 53 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 50.7
Write 47.3
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 53.4
39% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 69%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$37
331GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 75 73 72 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 55.7
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 72.6
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 69%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 66 94 88 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 74.5
Write 68.2
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 82.4
49% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 78%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
279GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 70.8
Write 53.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 76.9
81% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
107GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 60 58 59 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 62
Write 65.5
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 59.1
78% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
27.8% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.1
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 48%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 3,437 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $687
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback