Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '20 at 18:18
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-9960X-$1,337
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 73.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 249
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 1,007
93% 756 Pts
64-Core 2,628
176% 2,628 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$408
EVGA(3842 5170) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Lighting 269
Reflection 277
Parallax 280
71% 275 fps
MRender 191
Gravity 259
Splatting 209
72% 220 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 85%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$180
692GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1861 1870 1265 994 1008 1008 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 1,950
Write 1,838
Mixed 1,274
SusWrite 1,334
359% 1,599 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 196
4K Mixed 67.3
266% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,380
DQ Write 1,186
DQ Mixed 1,294
966% 1,287 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 297%
Great: 353%
Sandisk S3 2T00 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 411030RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 446 440 441 441 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 421
Mixed 368
SusWrite 445
95% 419 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 37.1
142% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 245
212% 314 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 104%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$300
1TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 447 445 441 442 442 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 428
Mixed 398
SusWrite 446
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 47.2
168% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 354
266% 354 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Intel HBRPEKNX0202AH 512GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 921 923 923 918 919 919 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 134 138 135 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 141
Write 137
Mixed 89
SusWrite 135
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix HMA82GU6JJR8N-VK 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.3% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 21.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 10.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 94%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 3,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,283
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback