Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	13GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Google Compute Engine (all builds)
Motherboard	Google Google Compute Engine
Memory	10.3 GB free of 13 GB
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110101
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '20 at 19:56
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon 381 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Memory 54.2 1-Core 57.9 2-Core 112 44% 74.8 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 119 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 117 7% 117 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T4 176 User benchmarks, average bench 73% Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 431.79 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.2% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 87.7 Parallax 80.6 53% 77.7 fps	MRender 91.7 Gravity 73.5 Splatting 77.5 66% 80.9 fps
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 80%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Google PersistentDisk 54GB 490 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 46 24 24 24 24 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x13GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 1 of 1 slots used 13GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 6.3 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 6.2 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 146 27% 146 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 102%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 40%

Speed boat

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 35%

Jet ski

SSD
PersistentDisk 1TBGoogleBench 44%, 5 samples	1x
nvme_card-pd 537GBBench 45%, 4 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16