HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory	7.7 GB free of 12.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090825
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 06 '20 at 19:43
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B95 2,408 User benchmarks, average bench 53% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 40.4 2-Core 69.6 44% 63.9 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 122 15% 113 Pts	64-Core 104 6% 104 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 18.9 Reflection 14.5 Parallax 18 15% 17.1 fps	MRender 15.8 Gravity 19.4 Splatting 21.4 16% 18.9 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 65 57 68 73 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 83.5 Write 94.5 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 63.6 55% 74.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 70%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 700 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2.5TB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 25.4 Write 24.7 Mixed 20 SusWrite 24.7 32% 23.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:0D 9B ID:04 CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL ID:04 CD F3-12800CL9-4GBXL ID:0D 9B 48GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	26.3% Poor	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC

CPU
Phenom II X4 B95AMDBench 53%, 2,408 samples	26x
Athlon II X2 B24AMDBench 42%, 2,045 samples	22x
Athlon II X2 B28AMDBench 45%, 816 samples	13x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	44x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	10x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	2x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x

RAM
ID:86 34 SUPERTALENT02 ID:86 34 SUPERTALENT02 41GBUnknownBench 31%, 26 samples	6x
ID:80 CE M378B1G73QH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73QH0-CK0 49GBUnknownBench 31%, 14 samples	3x
ID:85 9B CT51264BD160BJ.M8 ID:05 9B CT51264BD16OBJ 44GBUnknownBench 27%, 3 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16