| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 60% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Biostar A960D+V2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20151125 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 06 '20 at 19:36 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.7%
Above average
|
51% 78.3 Pts
|
25% 192 Pts
|
13% 205 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
60%
Good
|
56% 78 fps
|
69% 85.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 178 177 189 180 190 MB/s
|
38.9%
Below average
|
41% 184 MB/s
|
58% 18.9 MB/s
|
26% 36.8 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
225GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 45 45 41 39 36 MB/s
|
25%
Poor
|
36% 48.2 MB/s
|
120% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 933 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.6%
Average
|
49% 17.3 GB/s
|
27% 9.43 GB/s
|
55% 72.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A960D+V2 Builds (Compare 98 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar A960D+V2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples | 26x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 18x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 18x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 25x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 14x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 13x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $227 |