Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190822
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '20 at 07:34
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 236
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 616
62% 501 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.7% Good
Lighting 86.4
Reflection 82.7
Parallax 76.8
70% 82 fps
MRender 103
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 74.3
68% 85.1 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 616 426 426 428 369 306 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,187
Write 1164
Mixed 1,007
SusWrite 428
212% 947 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 62.9
213% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 847
DQ Write 764
DQ Mixed 722
564% 778 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 176%
Great: 187%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
349GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 367 367 365 357 368 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 457
Mixed 401
SusWrite 376
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 93.7
4K Mixed 37.4
140% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 246
182% 239 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 129%
Walgreen Infinitive 64GB
28GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.9 11 12 10 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 13.5
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 10.8
22% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2
140% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (91st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 27.3
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 24.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_TUF505DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback