Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds)
Memory	24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '20 at 17:08
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900KS 12,840 User benchmarks, average bench 99% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 155 2-Core 286 98% 178 Pts	4-Core 520 8-Core 976 89% 748 Pts	64-Core 1,755 109% 1,755 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.86 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Lighting 40 Reflection 40.7 Parallax 36.6 33% 39.1 fps	MRender 51 Gravity 36.5 Splatting 39.1 34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 510 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 3,035 User benchmarks, average bench 233% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: STES1020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1235 877 969 954 960 954 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	212% Outstanding	Read 1,078 Write 1,649 Mixed 1,269 SusWrite 991 282% 1,247 MB/s	4K Read 45.8 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 59.9 219% 81 MB/s	DQ Read 840 DQ Write 1,024 DQ Mixed 748 615% 871 MB/s
Poor: 136% ↑ This bench: 212% Great: 371%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-4000 4x8GB 1,219 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 21.8 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.4 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 23.8 69% 24 GB/s	Latency 62.5 64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $300

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	4,760x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	4,664x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,799x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,319x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,138x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	1,085x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,046x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	812x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	686x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	511x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	508x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	467x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 116% - Outstanding

Total price: $910

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16