Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 6000 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3048h
Memory	1 GB free of 2.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '20 at 06:03
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	63%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9505-$250 2,124 User benchmarks, average bench 47% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 53.6 1-Core 35.9 2-Core 80.4 35% 56.6 Pts	4-Core 161 8-Core 159 22% 160 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 8C90) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	3.6% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 3.58 Parallax 4.16 4% 4 fps	MRender 5.52 Gravity 3.27 Splatting 5.17 4% 4.65 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.6% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: P190710b SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 200 196 233 234 234 MB/s Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.6% Above average	Read 198 Write 174 Mixed 196 SusWrite 218 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 30.6 4K Mixed 21.3 76% 24.6 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 163 DQ Mixed 180 134% 177 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 101%
Maxtor STM380815AS 80GB 875 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 64GB free Firmware: 4.AAB SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 70 72 73 73 72 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 73.1 Write 67.8 Mixed 40.9 SusWrite 72 46% 63.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 42%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 3,454 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 864GB free, PID a00d Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 82 85 87 86 87 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 83.9 Write 84.8 Mixed 32.1 SusWrite 85.5 95% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:01 7A 78.A1GC6.9H10C 38GB 1333, 0 MHz 2048, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	17.5% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 6.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.4 11% 3.8 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	97x
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples	81x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	34x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	205x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	36x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	6x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	16x
ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB ID:80 AD HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 52GBUnknownBench 33%, 46 samples	7x
ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 505 samples	7x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16