Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 73.8 1-Core 28.9 2-Core 57.1 38% 53.3 Pts	4-Core 49.7 8-Core 78.7 8% 64.2 Pts	64-Core 38.6 2% 38.6 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sony(104D 907B) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.34% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 0.97 1% 1.46 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2.52 2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.34% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: LCSi SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 123 110 122 128 124 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.5% Below average	Read 184 Write 159 Mixed 133 SusWrite 122 34% 150 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 11.4 33% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 121 95% 132 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 14.8 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 4.2 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 92.8 43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16