Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	12.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2557M 714 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Socket BGA1023, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 60.5 1-Core 65 2-Core 56.2 41% 60.6 Pts	4-Core 51.5 8-Core 50.4 7% 51 Pts	64-Core 48.7 3% 48.7 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0009) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.67 Reflection 2.62 Parallax 0.5 1% 1.59 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 0.17 Splatting 1.22 1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNB128GMCJ 128GB 582 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: AJTA0202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 18 16 21 23 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 133 Write 41.7 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 21.6 12% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 4.2 19% 6.67 MB/s	DQ Read 7.2 DQ Write 22.8 DQ Mixed 10.8 10% 13.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.9 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	42x

SSD
THNSNB128GMCJ 128GBToshibaBench 16%, 582 samples	20x
850 EVO mSATA 250GBSamsungBench 95%, 4,026 samples	3x
THNSNS Series mSATA PCI-E 128GB ToshibaBench 67%, 614 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16