Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '20 at 07:07
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$970
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 215
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 798
77% 619 Pts
64-Core 1676
112% 1676 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$150
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
31.2% Below average
Lighting 117
Reflection 80.8
Parallax 122
31% 106 fps
MRender 81.8
Gravity 114
Splatting 83.6
31% 93.2 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$180
725GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1276 1107 1164 1148 1143 1006 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,050
Write 1,946
Mixed 1,357
SusWrite 1,141
364% 1,623 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 67.1
257% 97.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,366
DQ Write 1202
DQ Mixed 1,280
961% 1,283 MB/s
Poor: 202%
This bench: 287%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$269
502GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 401 278 193 198 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 435
Write 426
Mixed 383
SusWrite 284
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 38.9
126% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 281
211% 281 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 133%
Seagate SkyHawk 6TB (2016)-$173
4.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 181 174 175 179 175 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 100%
Seagate SkyHawk 6TB (2016)-$173
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 219 217 217 218 213 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 100%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB-$255
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
MC Read 29
MC Write 47.9
MC Mixed 29.6
102% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 9
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 127%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 2,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $1,433
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $159Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback