Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 19.9 2-Core 35.4 28% 38.4 Pts	4-Core 48.2 8-Core 50.2 6% 49.2 Pts	64-Core 49.4 3% 49.4 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1652) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.82% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 1.03 Splatting 3.48 2% 2.49 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.82% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 247 305 289 289 151 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55 30,952 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 542GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 47 54 55 55 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Read 52.5 Write 52.3 Mixed 42.8 SusWrite 49.2 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 8.7 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.6 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	76x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	14x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	9x

RAM
0194 SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 6GBHB3SU004GFM8MMB33Bench 37%, 45 samples	6x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 19%, 1,846 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	4x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16