Asus Z87-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus Z87-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '20 at 08:13
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 132
2-Core 260
91% 162 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 699
72% 583 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
PNY(196E 133C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 124
Parallax 129
103% 126 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 112
Splatting 99.1
100% 127 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 155 153 142 69 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 361
Write 251
Mixed 271
SusWrite 128
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 48.2
178% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 219
175% 246 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 95%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
67GB free
Firmware: RVT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,593
Write 7,498
Mixed 7,711
1,769% 7,934 MB/s
4K Read 1,011
4K Write 731
4K Mixed 205
2,182% 649 MB/s
DQ Read 1,943
DQ Write 1,544
DQ Mixed 1,662
1,266% 1,716 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
68GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 117 118 117 117 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 193
Write 138
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 118
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.7
455% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 112%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$75
104GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 164 164 164 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 141
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 164
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 2.5
429% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 108%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
175GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 111 112 111 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 173
Write 194
Mixed 92.3
SusWrite 112
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
216% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
100GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 114 114 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 134
Write 108
Mixed 108
SusWrite 112
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
ST932042 3AS 320GB
11GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 58 58 58 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 67.3
Write 69.3
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 57.2
79% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 37%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB
35GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 54 54 56 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 86.8
Write 87.3
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 54.9
90% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 42%
ST932032 0AS 320GB
32GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 40 41 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 32.8
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 40.2
43% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 25.5
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 24.4
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-DELUXE Builds (Compare 463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Z87-DELUXE - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $602
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback