bin bin

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System
Motherboard	Intel NUC5i5RYB
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170929
Uptime	134.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '20 at 19:02
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-5250U 4,386 User benchmarks, average bench 49% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Memory 73.5 1-Core 49.9 2-Core 79.1 45% 67.5 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 112 14% 109 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile) 5,021 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Intel(8086 2057) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	2.42% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 3.42 Parallax 3.56 2% 3.2 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 2.87 Splatting 4.78 3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.42% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC300 240GB-$81 2,054 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 127 164 137 142 158 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 367 Write 236 Mixed 283 SusWrite 145 58% 258 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 32.3 101% 34.5 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 224 DQ Mixed 268 193% 248 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion 750GB 207 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 471GB free Firmware: 0502 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 94 108 107 99 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 105 Write 97 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 103 69% 93.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 58%
Samsung STORY Station 1.5TB 903 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 553GB free, PID 5f06 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 38 35 34 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 11.5 Write 19.8 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 36.2 36% 24.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BF160B.C16 1x8GB 5,265 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 8.6 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 7.8 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 8.7 24% 8.33 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	2,022x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	1,566x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	932x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	821x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	516x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	376x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	297x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16