Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 (all builds)
Memory	19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141106
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '20 at 17:58
Run Duration	401 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	67.6% Good	Memory 87.2 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 148 63% 103 Pts	4-Core 260 8-Core 435 42% 348 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 8C94) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Lighting 72.3 Reflection 75.9 Parallax 65.4 59% 71.2 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 68.6 Splatting 69.8 57% 70 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 60%
AMD RX 550-$79 79,894 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.11.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 22.4 15% 24 fps	MRender 29.3 Gravity 16.4 Splatting 34.9 23% 26.9 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GB-$209 7,834 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 98GB free (System drive) Firmware: LH6i Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 250 Write 201 Mixed 223 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 35.4 132% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 162 DQ Mixed 124 114% 178 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 82%
MB2000EBZQC 2TB 993 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: HPG2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 124 Write 40.3 Mixed 49.3 53% 71.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ABA200V 2TB 2,433 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 1TB free Firmware: MZ4OABC0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 146 Write 142 Mixed 36.9 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 493GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 104 Write 73.4 Mixed 70.8 62% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 474GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 118 Write 116 Mixed 84.3 79% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 243% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 248GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 100 Write 94.3 Mixed 65.5 64% 86.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 87%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 237GB free Firmware: 01.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 133 Write 90.2 Mixed 76.2 74% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB 40,989 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 196GB free Firmware: 01.0 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 66.9 Mixed 40.3 41% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 61%
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$45 9,464 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 328GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 108 109 109 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 106 Write 101 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 108 67% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 337GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 126 126 123 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 117 Write 96.2 Mixed 66.3 SusWrite 123 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 326GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 124 123 125 123 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 117 Write 98.7 Mixed 71.3 SusWrite 123 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.3 255% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 699GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 123 124 126 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 115 Write 105 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 124 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 483GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 149 149 149 149 150 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Read 140 Write 103 Mixed 79.7 SusWrite 149 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 341GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 125 124 125 126 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 117 Write 73.7 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 123 69% 94.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 256GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 45 85 96 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	52% Above average	Read 112 Write 56.7 Mixed 59 SusWrite 68.7 55% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 930GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 124 122 124 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 114 Write 53.7 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 123 66% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 109%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 930GB free Firmware: 04.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 12 12 12 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 66.8 Write 2.2 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 12 19% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 79%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 930GB free Firmware: 03.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	25.7% Poor	Read 77.9 Write 26 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 11.5 27% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 25.7% Great: 62%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 930GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 6.1 6.1 6 6.1 6.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 79.7 Write 21.4 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 6.2 24% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 79%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 930GB free Firmware: 03.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.2 6 6.1 6 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 64.7 Write 19 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 6.1 20% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 79%
Philips GoGear SA1VBExx 4GB 2GB free, PID 208f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.1 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	1.97% Terrible	Read 8.3 Write 3 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 3.1 6% 4.72 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DATEN 4GD16 1 Kingston 99U5471-050.A Corsair CMX8GX3M2A133 Kingston 99U5471-054.A 24GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 800, 800, 667, 800 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	43% Average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 13.9 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.4 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 70.3 57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 - $192

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	143x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	28x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	24x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	25x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	44x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	28x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16