Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus M52BC_M32BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150812
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '20 at 14:42
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8300-$168 49,767 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 87.6 1-Core 69.7 2-Core 140 61% 99.2 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 393 40% 323 Pts	64-Core 391 24% 391 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Asus(1043 04E5) ≥ 4GB CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.1.4 Performing below potential (54^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.3% Below average	Lighting 41.8 Reflection 47.5 Parallax 55 34% 48.1 fps	MRender 47 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 33.7 32% 39.9 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$84 31,280 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 355GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0427ANR SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 410 412 418 422 426 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	Read 465 Write 423 Mixed 390 SusWrite 412 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 42.1 139% 48.6 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 211 169% 238 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 127%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 35,039 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 117 119 119 120 118 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 174 Write 134 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 119 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 500GB 5,329 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 466GB free Firmware: 0502 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 29 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 29.7 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 29.6 21% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	MC Read 11.7 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 10.5 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

CPU
FX-8310AMDBench 60%, 1,697 samples	31x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	14x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	10x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	2x
SSD 500GBSeagateBench 90%, 1,930 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	2x

RAM
ASU16D3LU1KBGR/4G 4x4GBKingstonBench 42%, 103 samples	5x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	4x
ASU16D3LU1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 651 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16