Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA (all builds)
Memory	56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 02 '20 at 00:43
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$798 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Memory 67.3 1-Core 125 2-Core 245 78% 146 Pts	4-Core 474 8-Core 916 82% 695 Pts	64-Core 2,214 137% 2,214 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8592) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Lighting 148 Reflection 159 Parallax 150 121% 152 fps	MRender 122 Gravity 143 Splatting 116 103% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 233GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 308 323 320 245 157 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	87.1% Excellent	Read 349 Write 351 Mixed 322 SusWrite 273 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 67.6 4K Mixed 45.9 150% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 219 163% 217 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 87.1% Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 7,881 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 509GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2378 2196 1434 1458 1467 1468 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 127%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296 5,447 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 164 159 169 165 165 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 116 Write 200 Mixed 110 SusWrite 165 109% 148 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1 388% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB 18,655 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	141% Outstanding	MC Read 58.2 MC Write 54.2 MC Mixed 57.1 161% 56.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 32.9 SC Mixed 22.8 68% 23.7 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 156%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME ALPHA

CPU
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $798Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	94x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	26x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	12x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	68x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	7x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $46Bench 234%, 87,206 samples	25x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	16x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBAdata $82Bench 242%, 74,184 samples	10x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	49x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x16GBG.SKILLBench 127%, 124 samples	4x
F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 105%, 6,151 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,398

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16