Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M2N32 WS Professional (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070622
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '20 at 22:19
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	42%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5200+ 5,400 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Memory 81.2 1-Core 27.7 2-Core 78.2 42% 62.4 Pts	4-Core 77.2 8-Core 76 10% 76.6 Pts	64-Core 73.9 5% 73.9 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5500 5,613 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 254B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.911.0.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.83% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 5.77 Parallax 3.97 4% 4.78 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 3.43 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.71 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.83% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU 800 128GB 245 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 165 191 172 69 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.9% Above average	Read 234 Write 190 Mixed 199 SusWrite 159 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 49.5 4K Mixed 30.9 96% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 78.8 DQ Write 81.8 DQ Mixed 83.5 62% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 7.3 21% 7.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 6.2 19% 6.53 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16