Clevo P15xEMx

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Clevo P15xEMx (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO P15xEMx
Memory	25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121219
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '20 at 21:26
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	95%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549 3,981 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 72 2-Core 143 60% 99.7 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 361 37% 298 Pts	64-Core 363 22% 363 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 5105) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2867 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.9% Terrible	Lighting 4.27 Reflection 4.73 Parallax 2.94 4% 3.98 fps	MRender 6.14 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 7.96 5% 5.51 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.9% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 228GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 417 418 388 395 422 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	97.7% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 406 Mixed 380 SusWrite 411 94% 419 MB/s	4K Read 28.5 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 36.2 118% 39.8 MB/s	DQ Read 393 DQ Write 352 DQ Mixed 367 277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 97.7% Great: 124%
Corsair Survivor 3.0 253GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 48GB free, PID 1a04 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 81 86 89 46 68 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.8% Below average	Read 131 Write 51.2 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 67.5 85% 72.2 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.3 83% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB 433 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 17.9 57% 19.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 15 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 73.4 54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P15xEMx Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Clevo P15xEMx

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	21x
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	20x
Core i7-3740QMIntel $220Bench 64%, 14,369 samples	8x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	46x
GTX 670MXNvidiaBench 12%, 2,325 samples	4x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x

SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBKingstonBench 52%, 470 samples	4x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $486

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16