HP Compaq dc7700 Ultra-slim Desktop

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq dc7700 Ultra-slim Desktop  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A5Ch
Memory2.4 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070413
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '20 at 14:33
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 4300-$70
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 65.8
1-Core 19.9
2-Core 36.6
31% 40.8 Pts
4-Core 41.1
8-Core 37.8
5% 39.4 Pts
64-Core 39.7
2% 39.7 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-PRO
Dell(1028 0402) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.74 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 211 120 53 51 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 197
Write 138
Mixed 211
SusWrite 111
37% 164 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 18
79% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.5
DQ Write 89.2
DQ Mixed 24.2
29% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 37GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 1024, 33792 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.33 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback