Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus M32CD4-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170106
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '20 at 10:04
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 205 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 412 8-Core 399 55% 406 Pts	64-Core 414 26% 414 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 200B) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	54.5% Above average	Lighting 66.7 Reflection 65.8 Parallax 58.1 54% 63.5 fps	MRender 70.4 Gravity 63.1 Splatting 67 55% 66.8 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 54.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBAT128G1002 128GB 3,654 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2317002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 178 182 182 183 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 442 Write 179 Mixed 179 SusWrite 174 54% 244 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 11.7 106% 45.6 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 181 DQ Mixed 81.3 86% 142 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 761GB free Firmware: MS2OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 182 181 183 182 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 164 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 179 97% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 134% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 1x16GB 5,600 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	45.9% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 13.8 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 688 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus M32CD4-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	394x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	262x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	207x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	91x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	50x

SSD
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	60x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	48x
SD8SB8U512G1002 512GBSandiskBench 81%, 2,367 samples	21x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	105x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 12GBHynixBench 51%, 2,347 samples	47x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $196

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16