Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2467M 4,235 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 83.6 1-Core 59.5 2-Core 99.9 53% 81 Pts	4-Core 133 8-Core 133 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C098) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 3.23 Parallax 1.44 2% 2.26 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 3.96 2% 2.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPA128HMFU-000H1 128GB 908 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM1801Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 185 174 192 176 180 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 188 Write 205 Mixed 168 SusWrite 182 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 27.6 4K Mixed 12.2 46% 16.6 MB/s	DQ Read 94.8 DQ Write 48.8 DQ Mixed 21.5 29% 55 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2S4G64CB8HG5N-DI 2x4GB 864 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.6% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 13.2 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 57%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	13x

SSD
MZMPA128HMFU-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 32%, 908 samples	5x
PM830 mSATA 32GBSamsungBench 41%, 860 samples	3x
X18-M 160GBIntelBench 30%, 441 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	3x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16